Guide — for amounts that matter

Multisig wallets explained

Multisig is the answer to a question single-key wallets cannot answer well: what happens when one device is stolen, one backup is destroyed, or you are not around any more. Three keys, any two required, and none of those events is a crisis.

  • 2 of 3 The setup that suits almost everyone
  • 3 makers Use different manufacturers deliberately
  • ≈NZ$800 Typical hardware cost for three devices
  • Descriptor The backup people forget, and must not

What multisig actually does

A normal wallet has one private key. That key is a single point of failure in two opposite directions: if someone else gets it, they take everything; if you lose it, you lose everything. Every piece of advice about backups and passphrases is an attempt to manage that tension, and it is genuinely difficult to manage well.

Multisig removes the tension by requiring more than one key. In a two-of-three arrangement, three keys exist and any two of them together can authorise a transaction. One key on its own can do nothing at all. So:

  • A stolen device is not a loss, because one key cannot spend.
  • A destroyed backup is not a loss, because two other keys remain.
  • A leaked recovery phrase is not a loss, because it is one of three.
  • An executor holding one key gives your estate a path without giving them control while you are alive.

This is a genuinely different security posture rather than a marginal improvement, and it is what institutional custody looks like scaled down to a person. The cost is complexity, which is real and which we will be honest about below.

When it is worth the effort

We are not going to pretend everyone should do this. Multisig is a weekend project the first time, it needs desktop software, and it introduces a failure mode of its own that single-key wallets do not have.

Do it when the amount would materially change your life if it vanished. For many New Zealanders that lands somewhere above NZ$100,000, though the number is personal — someone with no other savings might reasonably feel that way about NZ$30,000.

Do it when someone other than you needs a path to the funds. An executor, a spouse who is not technical, a business partner, a family trust. This is the strongest argument and it applies at lower amounts, because the alternative — a sealed envelope containing twenty-four words — gives whoever holds it complete unilateral control the moment they open it.

Do not do it for a first hardware wallet, for an amount under about NZ$20,000, or before you have a properly tested single-key backup working. One hardware wallet with two written copies of the phrase in two buildings, verified by a wipe-and-restore, is the right answer for the large majority of holders and it is not a lesser choice.

Designing a two-of-three

Two-of-three is the arrangement that suits almost everyone, and the design decisions are about where the keys live rather than about the cryptography.

Key one: at home. Your primary signing device, the one you actually use. Kept where you can reach it.

Key two: offsite. A different building — a family member's house, a private vault, a workplace safe. This is the key that survives a house fire or a burglary. Most New Zealand banks have exited the safe deposit business, with New Zealand Vault having taken over the ANZ, BNZ and National Bank operations and Westpac still offering boxes, so a fireproof safe at a sibling's place is a perfectly reasonable answer.

Key three: with a third party. A solicitor holding it with your will, or a trusted person who knows what it is and does not know where the other two are. This is the inheritance key. They cannot spend alone, which is precisely why giving it to them is safe.

Use three different manufacturers. This is the part people skip and it matters. If all three keys sit on devices from the same maker, a firmware flaw or a supply-chain compromise affecting that maker could in principle reach all three. A Coldcard plus a Trezor plus a Keystone means an attacker has to defeat three different architectures with three different failure characteristics. This is exactly why we said, on our Ledger versus Trezor page, that the answer for multisig is "one of each".

What each key needs backing up

Every one of the three keys still has its own recovery phrase, and each needs writing down. That is three phrases, which sounds worse than one and is actually easier to live with: because any two keys suffice, losing one phrase entirely is survivable rather than catastrophic. The pressure on each individual backup is dramatically lower.

Building it: devices and software

The coordination happens on a desktop, and there is a clear best tool.

Sparrow Wallet is what we would use for Bitcoin multisig. Free, open source, supports multiple hardware wallet brands as co-signers, connects to your own full node if you run one, and its multisig construction and descriptor handling are the most capable available to a private individual. It is a serious piece of software with a learning curve to match, and it is worth the afternoon. See our desktop wallets page.

On the device side, Coldcard has the strongest multisig support — it can verify the multisig configuration on the device itself, which closes an attack where a compromised computer presents a wallet with an extra key you do not control. Keystone and Blockstream Jade both work well as co-signers, and Jade is available domestically through The Bitcoin Shop in Tauranga.

Budget roughly NZ$700 to NZ$900 for three devices, more if you want a Coldcard Q at US$239 in the mix. That is a real cost, and against a holding large enough to justify multisig it is a rounding error.

Test everything before funding. Build the wallet, back up all three phrases and the descriptor, then reconstruct the whole wallet from scratch using two of the three keys plus the descriptor, on a fresh install. Only when that works does money go in. Then send a small test amount and spend it back out, so you have proven the signing flow end to end. This is more testing than a single-key wallet needs, and the reason is the next section.

The descriptor, and the mistake people make

This is the failure mode unique to multisig and it catches people who did everything else right.

A multisig wallet is not defined by its keys alone. It is defined by a descriptor: a record of which public keys form the wallet, in what order, with what threshold and what derivation paths. To reconstruct the wallet you need two of the three private keys and the descriptor. Without the descriptor, you can hold two valid keys and still be unable to rebuild the wallet or spend from it.

The good news is that a descriptor contains no secrets — it is public information — so backing it up is easy and you can be liberal about it. Print it. Store a copy with each of the three key backups. Put it in your inventory document. Give a copy to your solicitor alongside the third key. There is no downside to redundancy here.

The bad news is that people forget, because a descriptor does not feel like a secret and therefore does not feel important. It is the single most likely reason a well-built multisig fails, and it is entirely preventable with a printer.

Multisig and inheritance

This is where multisig earns its keep for people whose holdings are not enormous, and it deserves emphasis because inheritance destroys more crypto than theft does.

The single-key approach to inheritance is a sealed envelope with your recovery phrase, held with your will. It works, and it has an obvious flaw: whoever holds that envelope has complete unilateral control from the moment they open it, and you are relying entirely on them not opening it early.

With two-of-three, your executor or a family member holds one key. They can do nothing with it alone. On your death, they combine it with a second key — held offsite, identified in your instructions — and the funds become accessible. No single person ever has unilateral control while you are alive, and no single loss breaks the arrangement.

Whatever structure you choose, leave a written explanation rather than only the material. A page describing what exists, roughly what it is worth, where each key and backup is, what the descriptor is for, and the practical steps — written for someone who does not know what a seed phrase is. Twenty-four words and a plastic device mean nothing to a non-technical beneficiary. Our backup guide covers the wording.

The honest downsides

Four, and you should weigh them properly rather than treat multisig as a free upgrade.

Complexity is a risk in itself. More moving parts means more ways to misconfigure something. The descriptor problem above is the clearest example, and there are others — wrong derivation paths, keys added in a different order, software that handles descriptors differently.

Spending is slower. Every transaction needs two devices, which if one lives offsite means a trip. That is by design and it is fine for savings; it is unworkable for anything you touch often.

Software support is narrower. Bitcoin multisig is well supported. Multisig on other chains varies considerably, and if you hold a broad portfolio you may find that only part of it can live in this arrangement.

Higher on-chain fees. Multisig transactions are larger, so they cost more to broadcast. Marginal, but real on Bitcoin during congestion — see our fees guide.

Our view

Multisig is the correct answer for a small number of people and a distraction for everyone else. If you are still working out what a derivation path is, build a single-key hardware wallet with a tested backup first and live with it for a year. If you are holding an amount where the failure of one device or one envelope would be genuinely serious, this is the arrangement that stops any single event mattering — and it is the only self-custody structure that solves inheritance without handing someone the keys early.

Frequently asked

Questions on this topic

What is a multisig crypto wallet?

An address that requires more than one private key to spend from. A two-of-three setup means three keys exist and any two of them together can authorise a transaction — so no single key can move funds, and losing any one key is not a problem. It removes the two things that destroy most self-custody: a single device that can be stolen and a single recovery phrase that can be lost.

When is multisig worth the effort?

Roughly when the amount would materially change your life if it vanished — for many New Zealanders that is somewhere above NZ$100,000, though the number is personal. It is also worth it well below that threshold if somebody other than you needs a path to the funds: an executor, a business partner, a trust. Below that, one hardware wallet with a properly tested backup is the right answer and multisig is over-engineering.

What is the best software for setting up multisig?

Sparrow Wallet on the desktop, for Bitcoin, without much competition. It is free, open source, handles multiple hardware wallet brands, connects to your own node, and its multisig construction tools are the most capable available to a private individual. Coldcard has the best device-side multisig support, and Keystone and Jade both work well as co-signers.

Do I need three separate hardware wallets for multisig?

For a two-of-three setup, yes — and use three different manufacturers. That is the point: if all three keys sit on devices from the same maker, a single firmware flaw or supply-chain compromise could in principle affect all of them. A Coldcard plus a Trezor plus a Keystone means an attack has to succeed against three different architectures. Expect to spend somewhere around NZ$700 to NZ$900 on hardware.

Can multisig go wrong?

Yes, and the failure mode is losing your own wallet descriptor rather than losing keys. A multisig wallet needs both the keys and the descriptor — the record of which public keys form the wallet and what the threshold is — to be reconstructed. Lose the descriptor and you may hold two of three keys and still be unable to rebuild the wallet. Back up the descriptor everywhere you back up a seed phrase; it is not secret, so this is easy.

Next in this cluster

Keep reading